{"id":35,"date":"2016-01-18T11:00:00","date_gmt":"2016-01-18T19:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/?p=35"},"modified":"2018-02-19T13:08:49","modified_gmt":"2018-02-19T21:08:49","slug":"open-access-publishing","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/open-access-publishing\/","title":{"rendered":"Open access &#038; publishing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>Last modified 19 February 2018.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>As an alternative to copyright, there is open access (OA) and Creative Commons (CC) as a means of publishing, distributing, and licensing content.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>The term <em>copyright<\/em> and the \u00a9 (letter &#8220;c&#8221; inside a circle) equates to the legal phrase, <em>All rights reserved<\/em>. However, there are alternative licenses, such as Creative Commons, that offer intellectual property protection with <em>flexibility<\/em> \u2014 as signified by the expression, <em>Some rights reserved<\/em>. On a related note, also check out the posts on <a href=\"http:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/2015\/11\/12\/how-to-determine-copyright-public-domain-status\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">determining public domain<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/2016\/01\/18\/finding-media-producing-creative-works\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">finding public domain and DRM-free media<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Open_access\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open access<\/a> refers to works \u2014 be it research, entertainment media, and so on \u2014 that is free of restrictions to view, read, and in some cases, to use. This overlaps with, yet differs from <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Open_source\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">open source<\/a>, which refers to development or processes that allow the public to view and modify \u2014 such as software code, hardware specifications, and so forth. OA refers to access availability (licensing, publication, and distribution), whereas open source refers to source <em>code<\/em>.<\/p>\n<h2>Creative Commons<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">About the different kinds<\/a> of CC licenses, plus a <a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/choose\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">tool to help you select<\/a> the right one for your needs \u2014 including code you can embed in your web content. Check out their <a href=\"https:\/\/wiki.creativecommons.org\/wiki\/Frequently_Asked_Questions\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">FAQ<\/a> for more information.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/search.creativecommons.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CC Search<\/a>: Although not a search engine as such, this tool\u00a0offers a one-stop place to search for CC-licensed content, based on media and organization (Wikimedia, Google, YouTube, etc.).<\/p>\n<p>Creative Commons also offers descriptions, labels, and embed code for <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/cc0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>No rights reserved<\/em><\/a> (CC0) \u2014 i.e., a clear way for modern creators and researchers to &#8220;[provide] the best and most complete alternative for contributing a work to the public domain.&#8221; Additionally, CC offers a public domain mark\u00a0and embed code where there is <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/about\/pdm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>No known copyright<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(a crossed-out circle containing &#8220;c&#8221;).<\/p>\n<h2>Open education resources<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.openculture.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Culture<\/a> offers a huge resource of free artistic, cultural, and educational resources.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Open_educational_resources\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Educational Resources <\/a>(OER) is\u00a0a growing area of OA licensed and freely available materials for teachers and students.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/net.educause.edu\/ir\/library\/pdf\/ELi7061.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">7 things you should know about Open Educational Resources<\/a> (PDF, Educause, 2010) gives a clear overview of OER&#8217;s background and objectives.<\/p>\n<p>Edutopia has an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.edutopia.org\/open-educational-resources-guide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OER Resource Roundup<\/a> (24 November 2014) that includes guides, blogs, textbook alternatives, lessons tips, and more.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/archive.org\/details\/education\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Internet Archive<\/a> has many OER items available.<\/p>\n<p>UNESCO&#8217;s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/oerknowledgecloud.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OER Knowledge Cloud<\/a>\u00a0is a searchable database on OER and MOOC articles and resources.<\/p>\n<p>Several universities offer OER resources:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/cnx.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">OpenStax<\/a>, by Rice University<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.openwa.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Washington<\/a>, by the Washington State Board for Community and Technical Colleges<\/li>\n<li>UMass-Amherst Libraries&#8217; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.library.umass.edu\/services\/teaching-and-learning\/oer\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Educational Resources<\/a><\/li>\n<li>University of Minnesota Libraries&#8217; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lib.umn.edu\/elearning\/partnership\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Partnership for Affordable Content<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Government &amp; academic resources<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">arXiv<\/a> (pronounced as &#8220;archive) provides open access to publications on physics, mathematics, economics, computer science, quantitative biology and finance, electronic engineering and systems science, and statistics.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/eprints.rclis.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">E-LIS<\/a> (E-prints in Library &amp; Information Science) lets librarians, library students, and LIS professionals submit\u00a0all manner of LIS-related works (e.g., papers, tutorials, talks, guides, etc.) into an OA repository.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/eigenfactor.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Eigenfactor Project<\/a>: Visit\u00a0this website if you&#8217;re curious about altmetrics and its effect on publishing and academia.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/peerproduction.net\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Journal of Peer Production<\/em><\/a> (JoPP) &#8220;seeks high-quality contributions from researchers and practitioners of peer production [. . . ,] as a mode of commons-based and oriented production in which participation is voluntary and predicated on the self-selection of tasks,&#8221; e.g., Wikipedia and the Free Software Foundation.<\/p>\n<p>Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC) advocates for more open forms of publication and scholarly communication. This includes promoting <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sparc.arl.org\/issues\/open-access\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">open access<\/a>, such as improving authors&#8217; rights with an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sparc.arl.org\/resources\/authors\/addendum\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">addendum to secure creator rights<\/a> to publications, and improved <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sparc.arl.org\/initiatives\/funds\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">funding to open access<\/a> journals that require large submission fees.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/science\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Science Commons<\/a> also has\u00a0a <a href=\"http:\/\/scholars.sciencecommons.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Scholar&#8217;s Copyright Addendum Engine<\/a> that, like\u00a0SPARC&#8217;s, allows researchers to create forms in order to maintain author rights.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sherpa.ac.uk\/romeo\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SHERPA\/RoMEO<\/a> is a searchable database of research and academic journals and publishers, where you can find what the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Self-archiving\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">self-archiving<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sherpa.ac.uk\/romeo\/definitions.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">rules<\/a> are before submission.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ssrn.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Social Science Research Network<\/a>\u00a0(SSRN) is the largest worldwide community of social science researchers that aims for wide, OA repository and distribution of research to researchers and students. (<strong>N.B.<\/strong> SSRN was bought by academic publisher Elsevier, although SSRN remains useable and operational as of this writing.)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/unpaywall.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Unpaywall<\/a> is a web browser extension (Chrome and Firefox) that helps you search for specific open access articles.<\/p>\n<p>Wikipedia maintains a detailed article on <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_academic_databases_and_search_engines\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">academic and research databases \/ search engines<\/a>, denoting which are open access, commercial with paywall, and with limited public access.<\/p>\n<h2>Other organizations &amp; resources<\/h2>\n<p>There are many OA directories; here are a couple\u00a0well known ones:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/doaj.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Directory of Open Access Journals<\/a> (DOAJ), where you can search by subject, language, as well as title.<\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/oad.simmons.edu\/oadwiki\/Main_Page\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Access Directory<\/a> (OAD) at Simmons College<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.gnu.org\/licenses\/copyleft.en.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Copyleft<\/a> is another copyright alternative that supports derivative and share-alike rights \u2014 particularly for software, such as the GNU General Public License (GPL).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/okfn.org\/opendata\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open Knowledge<\/a> promotes open access to and <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.okfn.org\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">news<\/a> on data for public and research purposes, including area such\u00a0as statistics, finances, weather, transportation, and the social and natural sciences.<\/p>\n<p>Not to be disregarded is the <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Pirate_Party\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pirate Movement<\/a>, including <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Pirate_Bay\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Pirate Bay<\/a>, which is a disruptive complement to open access. They represent a more radical, free way to access information, notably expensive materials such as academic papers behind paywalls. Two well-known examples are <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Sci-Hub\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Sci-Hub<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Library_Genesis\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Library Genesis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Articles<\/h2>\n<p>Do read Ian Graber-Stiehl&#8217;s detailed, thought-provoking history of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/2018\/2\/8\/16985666\/alexandra-elbakyan-sci-hub-open-access-science-papers-lawsuit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Alexandra\u00a0Elbakyan&#8217;s Sci-Hub and open access<\/a> (8 February 2018).<\/p>\n<p>Peter Suber is widely viewed as the pioneer of the OA movement. Check out <a href=\"http:\/\/legacy.earlham.edu\/~peters\/fos\/overview.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">his overview<\/a>, as well as the website for <a href=\"http:\/\/cyber.law.harvard.edu\/hoap\/Open_Access_(the_book)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">his book <em>Open Access<\/em><\/a> (2012, MIT Press).<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.lse.ac.uk\/impactofsocialsciences\/2015\/11\/11\/101-innovations-in-scholarly-communication\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">101 Innovations in Scholarly Communication: How researchers are getting to grip with the myriad of new tools<\/a> (J. Bosman &amp; B. Kramer, 11 November 2015) nicely outlines the OA publication workflow as an enriching, iterative process of discovery, analysis, writing (and\/or creation), publication, outreach, and assessment.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/firstmonday.org\/article\/view\/1265\/1185\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The unacknowledged convergence of open source, open access, and open science<\/a> (J. Willinsky, August 2005) discusses the relations and overlap of OA, the open source movement in computers, publishing, and research.<\/p>\n<h3>&#8230;But be careful<\/h3>\n<p>There are so many OA journals, and like closed-access publications, their history and reputation <a href=\"http:\/\/chronicle.com\/article\/What-Open-Access-Publishing\/234108\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">can be rather complex \u2014 or even questionable<\/a>\u00a0(Wexler, 9 November 2015). Just because a journal is <em>OA does not mean it&#8217;s free for the submitting authors<\/em>, as noted above with the OA funding resources. Indeed, some places like the Public Library of Science (PLoS) can have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.plos.org\/plos-publication-costs-update\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">steep submission or publication fees<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Author beware<\/strong>:\u00a0<a class=\"external\" title=\"\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sherpa.ac.uk\/romeo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SHERPA\/RoMEO<\/a>\u00a0and Beall&#8217;s site on probable predatory OA journals would help in narrowing down appropriate publishing venues. Also read Bohannon and Morin&#8217;s articles on the problem of questionable OA peer-review processes.<\/p>\n<p>Beall, J. (2015, November 5). List of standalone journals: Potential, possible, or probable predatory scholarly open-access journals.\u00a0<em>Scholarly Open Access<\/em>. Retrieved from\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/scholarlyoa.com\/individual-journals\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/scholarlyoa.com\/individual-journals\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Bohannon, J. (2013, October 4). Who&#8217;s afraid of peer review?\u00a0<em>Science<\/em>. Retrieved from\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/content\/342\/6154\/60.full\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.sciencemag.org\/content\/342\/6154\/60.full<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Morin, M. (2013, October 3). The Wild West world of open-access journals.\u00a0<em>Los Angeles Times<\/em>. Retrieved from\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/science\/sciencenow\/la-sci-sn-fake-open-access-journal-paper-20131003-story.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/science\/sciencenow\/la-sci-sn-fake-open-access-journal-paper-20131003-story.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p><strong>Author beware, redux<\/strong>: However, even closed-access journals can suffer from poor refereeing. Consider how MIT&#8217;s SCIgen project generated fake computer science papers for review, and how well known publishers Springer and IEEE managed to review and accept some of those papers:<\/p>\n<p>Parallel &amp; Distributed Operating Systems Group, Massachussets Institute of Technology. (n.d.). SCIgen &#8211; An Automatic CS Paper Generator. Retrieved November 8, 2015, from\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"https:\/\/pdos.csail.mit.edu\/archive\/scigen\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/pdos.csail.mit.edu\/archive\/scigen\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Timmer, J. (2014, April 22). Publishing stings find predatory journals, shoddy peer review.\u00a0<em>Ars Technica<\/em>. Retrieved from\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/science\/2014\/04\/publishing-stings-find-predatory-journals-shoddy-peer-review\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/arstechnica.com\/science\/2014\/04\/publishing-stings-find-predatory-journals-shoddy-peer-review\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Van Noorden, R. (2014, February 24). Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers.\u00a0<em>Nature<\/em>. Retrieved from\u00a0<a class=\"external\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763<span class=\"screenreader-only\">\u00a0(Links to an external site.)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last modified 19 February 2018. As an alternative to copyright, there is open access (OA) and Creative Commons (CC) as a means of publishing, distributing, and licensing content.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":5,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-35","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/35","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/35\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":439,"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/35\/revisions\/439"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lis.iwaruna.com\/copyright-toolkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}